Vol. 9, No. 3

~F-;O-!'U~N~D;:-A-;-T;:-I-O;:-~N~-------- MAY/JUNE 2000 Vol. 9 N0.3 Dear Friends, The person who taped the sessions for the April 2000

Opinion about whether we had, in fact, Returned to Reason, was reminiscent of the weather: it varied. Some participants suggested that we were well on that road to reason, but others claimed that we had just found the signpost to the road. In the culture surrounding the recovered memory controversy,

believe that to be inconsistent. That is Search for Traumatic Memories saying "We want to be like medicine in getting payments but we don't want to

The majority quoted with approval: "[R~epressed ~em A three-judge panel of the Missouri Appea~s C.ou~ ory... remains woefully short of being empmcally venfied overturned a $1.17 verdict against Archbishop Justm R1galt and indeed, heralds from a non-rigorous school of psycholin a case in which Henry

See FMSF Newsletter June 1998 Vol 7 No 5 "Arizona Supreme Coun Hold.~ That Discovery Rule Applies to Repressed Memory Claim" for comments on the think· ing of the court in another repressed memory case. Ari;:onu Star, 4f20!00, "Arizona high coun allows for claims of 'repressed' memories of abuse," H