An Editorial Directory
The Disclosure Network
A neutral, sourced index of the people and organisations engaged with the UAP/UFO question in the present era. From print newsletters to podcasts and parliamentary questions, the civilian-research tradition that built this archive continues today across countries and platforms.
The Disclosure Network catalogues the people and organisations doing independent UAP/UFO work today. The archive does not take a position on whether disclosure is happening, what is being disclosed, or whose interpretation is correct. We document the work, cite the sources, and link to where each researcher publishes. Inclusion is editorial, not endorsement.
The Present Era
The years since 2017 have produced more on-record acknowledgement of UAP activity by governments and military institutions than the entire preceding seventy years combined. The Pentagon confirmed the FLIR1 video. Congress passed the UAP Disclosure Act of 2024. Three Navy aviators testified under oath at a House Oversight subcommittee. France's GEIPAN continues its public reporting. Brazil's National Archives released the SIAN files. Australia's Department of Defence acknowledged attending a Pentagon UAP briefing after initially denying it twice in Senate Estimates.
Around this institutional movement, a civilian community has built the publishing infrastructure that print newsletters provided in earlier decades. Podcasts, YouTube channels, Substack newsletters, and platform threads now do the work that The APRO Bulletin, The NICAP UFO Investigator, and FATE Magazine did before them. The medium shifted. The function is unchanged: independent researchers gathering reports, filing freedom-of-information requests, lobbying officials, and publishing for a community of interest.
This directory is the index of that work, organised by country, sourced to public statements, and updated as the network grows.
Browse by Country
Each country page describes what governments are and are not doing, who in the civilian community is documenting the gap, and what the on-record parliamentary or congressional activity looks like.
Methodology
- Sourcing. Every quoted statement is sourced to a public appearance, on-record interview, podcast episode, parliamentary record, court filing, or published article. No private claims. No anonymous sources.
- Neutrality. The archive does not endorse any researcher's framework or conclusion. Inclusion reflects public engagement with the topic, not agreement with the position.
- Right of correction. Every profile carries an editorial contact pointer. People profiled here can request corrections, additions, or the removal of material they consider misrepresented.
- Catalogue, not ranking. The directory lists people and organisations alphabetically or by country. No "top ten" framings, no league tables, no hierarchies of credibility imposed by the editor.
