Vol. 6, No. 7
Articles in This Issue
e:tistence vel non of negligence is a question of fact for the jury."); Wilkjnson v. .lhJ..wn, 885 F.Supp. 651 (U.S. Dist., April!?, 1995} {"plaintiffs have adduced sufficient facts to create a genuine issue as to whether Balsam ought reasonably to have foreseen that his negligent evaluation, diagno
Justice Berdon concurred with the majority that a deterAn accused father has sued a Sacramenta thempist who mination of whether a defendant owes a duty to another requires a two part inquiry: I) whether it is foreseeable that allegedly "implanted and reinforced" false memories of harm of the general
SCIENTIFIC AND PROFESSIONAL ADVISORY BOARD OF FMSF What are the professional accomplishments of thts remarkable board?
ADVISORY BOARD OF FMSF What are the professional accomplishments of thts remarkable board? What do they think about
What are the professional accomplishments of thts remarkable board? What do they think about the repressed memory controversy?
