Vol. 6, No. 8
Vol. 6, No. 8
Issue at a Glance
Articles
3
Content Types
Article, Legal Update
Articles in This Issue
REPRESSED MEMORY EVIDENCE RULED
Article
INADMISSIDLE IN CALIFORNIA Engstrom v. Engstrom, in the Court of Appea1 of the State of California, Second Appellate District, Division Two, 8098146 [lJ (June IS, 1997).
INADMISSIDLE IN CALIFORNIA
Article
Engstrom v. Engstrom, in the Court of Appea1 of the State of California, Second Appellate District, Division Two, 8098146 [lJ (June IS, 1997). In an unpubJished opinion, a California Court of Appeal
NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS
Legal Update
RULES TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF MEMORY REPRESSION ABSENT EXPERT TESTIMONY ON THE PHENOMENON Barret v. Hyldburg, _ S.E.2d _