Skip to content

Vol. 6, No. 8

Vol. 6, No. 8
3 articles
Issue at a Glance
Articles
3
Content Types
Article, Legal Update

Articles in This Issue

REPRESSED MEMORY EVIDENCE RULED
Article

INADMISSIDLE IN CALIFORNIA Engstrom v. Engstrom, in the Court of Appea1 of the State of California, Second Appellate District, Division Two, 8098146 [lJ (June IS, 1997).

INADMISSIDLE IN CALIFORNIA
Article

Engstrom v. Engstrom, in the Court of Appea1 of the State of California, Second Appellate District, Division Two, 8098146 [lJ (June IS, 1997). In an unpubJished opinion, a California Court of Appeal

NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS
Legal Update

RULES TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF MEMORY REPRESSION ABSENT EXPERT TESTIMONY ON THE PHENOMENON Barret v. Hyldburg, _ S.E.2d _

Home